Yes.

No, the Broker Contact Information section is not a substitute for the Texas REALTORS® Intermediary Relationship Notice (TXR 1409). The purpose of the Broker Contact Information section is to identify the brokers and sales agents involved in the transaction and provide their contact information. It does not contain the disclosures regarding intermediary representation, the broker’s role as intermediary, or the acknowledgements included in TXR 1409.

The notice serves important functions that are not addressed by the Broker Contact Information section. Specifically, TXR 1409:

• Serves as reaffirmation by the seller and buyer of the prior consent they gave in writing to the broker to act as an intermediary in the transaction
• Allows the broker to satisfy the requirement to provide written notice to all parties of the appointment of associated license holders to each side of the transaction if such appointments are made.

If an intermediary relationship exists, license holders should continue to comply with the applicable requirements of the The Real Estate License Act (TRELA) and any brokerage policies regarding intermediary disclosures. The addition of the Broker Contact Information section does not eliminate the need for TXR 1409 when that form is otherwise being used to document the intermediary relationship and any appointments.

When the listing agreement or buyer representation agreement has come into existence but no intermediary status yet exists, the broker may advise the parties generally on these matters. Once the intermediary status has been created, the intermediary broker may not express opinions or give advice during negotiations. When asked questions by the client, the intermediary broker may supply information about matters that do not constitute an opinion or advice. For example, the intermediary could tell the buyer what the prevailing interest rate is without expressing an opinion or giving advice. These same rules apply to an associated license holder acting as an intermediary without appointments made by the intermediary broker. If appointments have been made, the associated license holder who has been appointed to a party may provide opinions and advice during negotiations to that party.

Yes. The TXR listing agreements adhere to this practice.

Both. Initially, the broker makes a decision in determining the policy of the firm. If the broker does not wish to act as an intermediary, nothing requires the broker to do so. If the broker’s policy is to offer services as an intermediary, both parties must authorize the broker in writing before the broker may act as an intermediary or appoint license holders to work with each of the parties.

Yes. If the intermediary makes appointments, the law provides that the appointments are made by giving written notice to both parties. To give notice, the intermediary must identify the party and the associated license holder(s) appointed to that party. The Intermediary Relationship Notice (TXR 1409) can be used for this purpose. The law does not require notice if no appointments are made.

This is a judgment call for the intermediary. The intermediary relationship does not exist until the parties who have authorized it are beginning to deal with each other in a proposed real estate transaction; an example would be when the buyer begins to negotiate to purchase the seller’s property. Prior to the creation of the intermediary relationship, the broker will typically be acting as an exclusive agent of each party. If appointments are going to be made, they should be made before the buyer begins to receive advice and opinions from an associated license holder in connection with the property listed with the broker. If the broker appoints the associated license holders at the time the listing agreement and buyer representation agreement are signed, it should be clear that the appointments are effective only when the intermediary relationship arises. It is important to remember that both parties must be notified in writing of both appointments. If, for example, the listing agent is “appointed” at the time the listing is taken, care must be taken to ensure that the buyer is ultimately also given written notice of the appointment. The Intermediary Relationship Notice (TXR 1409) can be used for this purpose. When a buyer client begins to show interest in a property listed with the firm and both parties have authorized the intermediary relationship, the seller must be notified in writing as to which associate has been appointed to work with the buyer.

The Intermediary Relationship Notice (TXR 1409) is used for two purposes:

1) It serves as a reaffirmation by the seller and the buyer of the prior consent they both gave in writing to the broker to act as an intermediary in the transaction.

2) It is used by the broker to satisfy the requirement to give written notice to all parties of the appointment of associates to each side of the transaction if such appointments are to be made.

This form is not a substitute for the initial written consent that both parties gave when they each signed brokerage agreements with the broker. The Intermediary Relationship Notice should only be used if the seller and the buyer have given their written consent to the broker to act as an intermediary in the listing and buyer representation agreements. This form may also be used when the broker is acting as an intermediary in a landlord-tenant situation.

No. A second written consent is not required by TRELA, but a written notice of any appointments is required. A broker is not prohibited from obtaining a second consent as a business practice to identify and resolve potential conflicts.

Yes. If the intermediary authorizes another associated license holder to make the appointments, that person must not appoint himself or herself, as this would be an improper combination of the different functions of intermediary and associated license holders.

No. The law requires the intermediary to appoint different associated license holders to work with each party.

At the time of the first substantive dialogue with a seller or a prospective buyer, a license holder must provide the party with a copy of the Information About Brokerage Services (TXR-2501, TREC IABS 1-1) as required by The Real Estate License Act (TRELA). The IABS form includes an explanation of the intermediary relationship.

Before a broker may act as intermediary, TRELA requires the broker to obtain written consent from both parties. A written representation agreement between a broker and a seller or buyer will satisfy the consent requirement if the agreement: 1) authorizes the broker to act as an intermediary between the parties; 2) lists the conduct an intermediary is prohibited from performing in conspicuous bold or underlined print; and 3) states who will pay the broker. The agreement must also authorize the broker to appoint associated license holders if the broker intends to make appointments when the intermediary relationship arises. The Texas REALTORS® promulgated listing agreements and buyer/tenant representation agreements contain language necessary to fully comply with TRELA when creating an intermediary relationship.

When it becomes evident that the buyer represented by the firm wishes to purchase property listed with the firm, the intermediary status comes into play.

No. Appointing yourself, the firm’s broker, to represent one party and appointing an associated license holder to represent the other party in an intermediary situation is not considered fair and impartial under TRELA.

Yes. The solo broker may act as an intermediary, but that broker cannot make appointments of associated license holders to each of the parties.

Only a broker can contract with the parties to act as an intermediary between them. In that sense, only a broker can be an intermediary. If, however, the broker intermediary does not appoint associated license holders to work with the parties in a transaction, any associated license holders of the intermediary who function in that transaction would be required to act just as the intermediary does, not favoring one party over the other.

No. In the case of a for-sale-by-owner or other seller who is not already represented by a broker, the broker representing the buyer is not considered an intermediary. When a broker represents the buyer only, the buyer is the broker's client, and the seller is a customer. In those instances, the broker is obligated to act in the buyer's best interests. It is recommended to provide the Representation Disclosure (TXR 1417) form to the unrepresented seller, so that they know clearly that the broker only represents the buyer. Alternatively, the broker could secure the consent of both parties to act as an intermediary and have the seller sign a representation agreement. The TXR listing agreements and buyer/tenant representation agreements contain the requisite consents.

No. The broker could represent one of the parties and work with the other party as a customer rather than a client. For example, the buyer may agree to terminating the buyer representation agreement and the broker will represent the seller and work with the buyer as a customer. When a broker represents the seller only, the seller is the broker's client, and the buyer is a customer. In those instances, the broker is obligated to act in the seller's best interests. In such instances, it is recommended to provide the Representation Disclosure (TXR 1417) form to the unrepresented buyer, so that they know clearly who that the broker only represents the seller.

No.

The intermediary broker is authorized to facilitate a transaction between the parties but may not give advice or opinions to either party in negotiations. An associated license holder who is appointed to a party may provide advice or opinions to that party. Both intermediaries and associated license holders who are appointed to parties are obligated to treat the parties honestly and are prohibited from revealing confidential information.

During negotiations, the associated license holder who is appointed to one party may provide advice and opinions to the party. An associated license holder who has not been appointed must act in the same manner as the intermediary, not giving opinions and advice and not favoring one party over the other.

The intermediary is required to treat the parties fairly and honestly and to comply with TRELA. The intermediary is prohibited from favoring one party over the other and may not reveal confidential information obtained from one party without the written instructions of that party, unless disclosure of that information is required by TRELA, court order, or the information materially relates to the condition of the property. The intermediary and any associated license holders appointed by the intermediary are prohibited from disclosing, without written authorization, that the seller will accept a price less than the asking price or that the buyer will pay a price greater than the price submitted in a written offer.

There are two alternatives for the brokerage firm and the parties to consider in an intermediary relationship:

1) If the firm has obtained permission in writing from both parties to be an intermediary and to appoint associated license holders to work with the parties, the intermediary broker may appoint one associated license holder to the seller and a different associated license holder to the buyer. The associated license holders may provide opinions and advice during negotiations to the party to whom the license holder is appointed.

2) If the firm has obtained permission in writing from both parties to be an intermediary but does not appoint different associated license holders to work with the parties, then neither the broker nor any associated license holder may give advice or opinions to the parties. Instead, the broker and all associated license holders must remain neutral and not favor one party over the other.