Proposition 1 does not hurt school funding
09/29/2015 | Author: Mark Lehman
In Lehman's Terms
The purpose behind this column is to simplify legislative jargon and offer a clear understanding of public policy. Explaining the complicated wording of Proposition 1 on the statewide November 3 ballot is a perfect topic.
The simple effort to lower property taxes and ban a tax on real estate sales has resulted in a 112-word proposition on the ballot. That complex language distracts from the legislative intent of the measure and opens the door for misinformation. The latest misinformation about Prop 1 involves school funding.
Voters are being told that Proposition 1 will hurt school funding. This is absolutely not true.
It’s understandable to question how this measure affects school funding. After all, Proposition 1 lowers property taxes, and schools get all of their funding from property taxes.
However, in the legislation that resulted in Proposition 1, the Texas Legislature made it absolutely clear that school districts will not lose any funding as a result of the property-tax reduction.
Proposition 1 lowers property taxes, bans a sales tax on real estate, saves money for seniors and disabled Texans, and mandates that Texas reimburse local school districts for any loss in revenue.
That’s the 112-word ballot language in Lehman’s terms.
Mark Lehman is vice president of governmental affairs at the Texas Association of REALTORS®. Political ad by the Texas Association of REALTORS®.
Yes where will this reimbursement for schools come from…..? Hmmm…maybe the lottery ....yeah 5hat was a wolf in sheep’s clothing…red a ...NO to Prop 1… send my over pay tax to my local school…Texas can’t even keep computers in our local school. Number one for me is our future..Kids education and the ones teaching them.
It sounds too good to be true, therefore… after taking all in consideration it is not a good deal for the people, just more power for the politicians. Sorry can’t support it.
Put more school funding responsibility in the hands of our wacko state lege… What could possibly go wrong? Isn’t it pretty much their goal to destroy effective public education in favor of vouchers and charter schools? What about the likelihood that state funds will be tied to religious and idological boondoggles like abstinence-only sex ed and right wing revisionist history?
After seeing what they did in undermining Denton’s ability to regulate fracking at the local level Prop 1 seems like the worst idea possible. I ENJOY paying property taxes and chose my house primarily based on the quality of the schools. I don’t wish to have local control taken away and given to our horrible and reckless state legislature.
It’s lovely that they are lowering tac value by 10k but my local school is raising 351Miilion bond!! So that will be painful tax increase. #hpisd
Thanks for the interpretation, Mr. Lehman. I agree with others who’ve stated that this proposition tries to cover too much territory. To say that oil and gas excise tax revenues will make up for the difference in reduced school revenues (with oil prices as low as they are) is a big red flag to me. I can’t support this proposition AS IT IS WRITTEN without further clarification.
@Dyana: Currently, seniors’ frozen property taxes are calculated with a $15,000 homestead exemption. The language you referenced to “unfreeze” the taxes on senior citizens is simply the mechanism to get seniors and disabled Texans the benefit of the new $25,000 homestead exemption. The Texas Legislature made it clear that there will be no reappraisal of homes on the elderly. The value of the home that was established when their freeze went into effect will not be changed. Seniors will now use that same value plus a $25,000 homestead exemption instead of the previous $15,000 homestead exemption. Please make no mistake: Proposition 1 expands property tax relief for seniors and disabled Texans.
Thank you Mr. Lehman for the quick clarification. I guess I’d better do some more research as it sounds as if we’ve got excess revenues that we will give to School Districts to cover their losses, but! I’d have to see the numbers on that, as the enormity of the losses state-wide seems as if it would eat up rather quickly this excess you mention.
@Nancy: Sales-tax and oil-and-gas excise tax revenues in Texas are at an all-time high, so the funds will come from our surplus revenue. The Texas Legislature felt that instead of collecting more taxes that were not being spent, they would refund this money to the citizens of Texas as a property-tax reduction.
Mr. Lehman, when you say the proposition “mandates that Texas reimburse local school districts for any loss in revenue”, where will this reimbursement come from?
My concern with this proposition is they have too many items comingled into one vote. To unfreeze the taxes of retired persons is going to cause an immediate reappraisal of homes for the elderly that may not be able to recover from. This is a shame that the proposition is being done secretly and not making people aware of the true consequences.
Mark Lehman explains the ballot in terms even I can understand. Thank you!
Leave a Comment
The material provided here is for informational purposes only and is not intended and should not be considered as legal advice for your particular matter. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Applicability of the legal principles discussed in this material may differ substantially in individual situations.
While the Texas Association of REALTORS® has used reasonable efforts in collecting and preparing materials included here, due to the rapidly changing nature of the real estate marketplace and the law, and our reliance on information provided by outside sources, the Texas Association of REALTORS® makes no representation, warranty, or guarantee of the accuracy or reliability of any information provided here or elsewhere on texasrealestate.com. Any legal or other information found here, on texasrealestate.com, or at other sites to which we link, should be verified before it is relied upon.